Please note: Each time you take the test, the questions and their answer choices are randomly shuffled for a unique test experience.
0 of 10 Questions completed
Questions:
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading…
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You must first complete the following:
0 of 10 Questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 point(s), (0)
Earned Point(s): 0 of 0, (0)
0 Essay(s) Pending (Possible Point(s): 0)
Excerpt from The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain
Miss Watson she kept pecking at me, and it got tiresome and lonesome. By and by, they fetched the niggers in and had prayers, and then everybody was off to bed. I went up to my room with a piece of candle, and put it on the table. Then I set down in a chair by the window and tried to think of something cheerful, but it warn’t no use. I felt so lonesome I most wished I was dead. The stars were shining, and the leaves rustled in the woods ever so mournful; and I heard an owl, away off, who-whooing about somebody that was dead, and a whip-poor-will and a dog crying about somebody that was going to die; and the wind was trying to whisper something to me, and I couldn’t make out what it was, and so it made the cold shivers run over me.
What is the tone of the passage?
A) Nostalgic because the passage reflects a longing for the past and fond memories of better times.
B) Melancholic because the passage conveys a deep sense of sadness and loneliness in Huck’s thoughts and surroundings.
C) Hopeful because the passage suggests that Huck is looking forward to better days ahead.
D) Bitter because the passage shows Huck’s resentment and anger towards his situation.
Urban areas around the world are facing a crisis of green space. As cities expand and the need for housing grows, parks and natural areas are being replaced by concrete and steel. In “Metropolis,” the city council has proposed a plan to convert several underused plots of land into community green spaces.
The council claims that these new green spaces will provide numerous benefits. They will serve as a place for recreation, improve air quality, and even have a positive effect on the mental health of the city’s residents. They have cited studies showing that urban green spaces contribute to lower stress levels and increased happiness among urban dwellers.
However, a group of local business owners has raised concerns. They argue that the city should instead focus on economic development and that these plots of land would be better used for new businesses or housing developments. They claim that the economic benefits would outweigh the advantages of additional green spaces and that the current parks are sufficient for recreational needs.
The city council has responded to these concerns by pointing to research indicating that green spaces can actually boost local economies by increasing property values and attracting tourism. They conclude that the creation of these spaces is not just a matter of environmental or health importance but also an economic opportunity for the “Metropolis.”
Which claims lead to the conclusion that the city should invest in green spaces rather than new businesses?
Option A
Option B.
Letter by Sarah White:
Your recent feature on the benefits of working from home painted an overly rosy picture, in my opinion. You mentioned the increased productivity and flexibility it offers, but what about the mental health challenges? Has anyone considered the isolation and loneliness that many remote workers experience?
You also failed to address the long-term impact on team cohesion. How do you propose companies maintain a strong, collaborative culture when employees are physically distant?
And what about the blurred lines between work and personal life? With no clear separation, aren’t we setting people up for burnout?
Sarah White, employee advocate
Feature: The Advantages of Remote Work
Working from home has become a growing trend, offering numerous benefits such as increased productivity, greater flexibility, and a better work-life balance. Employees save time and money by not commuting, and companies can reduce their overhead costs.
Remote work also allows for a more diverse workforce, as it opens up opportunities for people who might not be able to work in a traditional office setting. It’s a win-win for both employees and employers.
How does White use rhetorical questions to support her purpose?
The sentence below is incomplete. Choose the option that correctly completes the sentence using formal standard English.
Eggs contain not only protein but _____
The sentence below is incomplete. Choose the option that correctly completes the sentence using formal standard English.
I’m going to name the new puppy after my favorite holiday, _____
Should the Penny Stay in Circulation?
The United States penny has been in circulation for over two centuries, making it one of the oldest coins still being minted today. However, in recent years, the penny has come under scrutiny, with many questioning its relevance in today’s economy.
On one hand, proponents of the penny argue that it serves as a tangible reminder of the country’s history and traditions. The face of Abraham Lincoln, a significant figure in American history, adorns the coin, emphasizing the penny’s symbolic value. Moreover, some businesses and consumers appreciate the penny for precise pricing, allowing prices like $4.99 instead of rounding up to $5.00.
Conversely, critics point out that the cost to produce a penny has exceeded its face value for years. In other words, it costs more than a cent to make a cent, which seems economically counterintuitive. Additionally, with the rise of electronic transactions, the necessity for such small denominations has decreased. Many believe that the time and resources spent on producing pennies could be better allocated elsewhere.
With these perspectives in mind, the debate continues: Should the penny remain in circulation, or is it time to bid this coin goodbye?
Based on the text, what is one reason people might not notice the absence of the penny?
Agenda Item 9: Community Park Renovations
Jordan Lin, Community Member
Since the early 1900s, our community park has been a sanctuary for families, fitness enthusiasts, and nature lovers alike. It was a place where the laughter of children filled the air as they played on swings and slides, where people jogged or walked dogs along tree-lined paths, and where weekend picnics brought neighbors together. However, as the years went by, the attention shifted towards digital entertainment, and our beloved park began to see fewer visitors.
Today, I propose that we revitalize our park to adapt to the modern needs of our citizens. This is not just about preserving history; it’s about enhancing community health and connectivity. Let’s introduce interactive fitness equipment that encourages physical activity among all age groups. How about free Wi-Fi hotspots so that people can stay connected even while enjoying the outdoors? And let’s not forget the potential for local cafes and artisans to set up shop, contributing to the park’s vibrancy and the city’s economy.
Yes, these upgrades will require investment, but the benefits far outweigh the costs. Studies have shown that green spaces significantly improve mental health and social cohesion. Besides, we have the opportunity to apply for government grants that could cover up to 50% of the renovation expenses.
Let us seize the moment to transform our community park into a hub of activity and engagement for the 21st century. Thank you.
Excerpt: Community Council Meeting Transcript Agenda Item 9: Community Park Renovations
Alex Torres, Local Resident May 3
Good evening, everyone. I have cherished our community park since I was a child. However, I hold a perspective that diverges from Mr. Lin’s regarding the park’s renovation.
Consider this: should we really pour money into modernizing a park when our community has more pressing concerns? I agree that the park has its charms and potential, but are tech upgrades truly what we need?
My answer is a resolute “no.”
Installing interactive fitness stations is a fine idea, but not everyone is inclined towards such activities. And Wi-Fi? The park should be a place to disconnect from technology, not become further entangled with it. As for encouraging businesses to enter the park space, this could detract from its natural beauty and peaceful atmosphere.
Mr. Lin mentions community health benefits, yet he overlooks that people have different preferences for relaxation and exercise. Not everyone thrives in an ‘upgraded’ environment. Some of us appreciate the park just as it is — simple and tranquil.
Instead of chasing after government grants for ambitious projects, why not allocate our resources to more fundamental services that our residents need, like improving public transportation or fixing the potholes that riddle our roads?
I respect Mr. Lin’s passion for innovation, but let’s not lose sight of our current necessities in pursuit of an idealistic future. Thank you.
How does Torres respond to Lin’s proposal?
Agenda Item 9: Community Park Renovations
Jordan Lin, Community Member
Since the early 1900s, our community park has been a sanctuary for families, fitness enthusiasts, and nature lovers alike. It was a place where the laughter of children filled the air as they played on swings and slides, where people jogged or walked dogs along tree-lined paths, and where weekend picnics brought neighbors together. However, as the years went by, the attention shifted towards digital entertainment, and our beloved park began to see fewer visitors.
Today, I propose that we revitalize our park to adapt to the modern needs of our citizens. This is not just about preserving history; it’s about enhancing community health and connectivity. Let’s introduce interactive fitness equipment that encourages physical activity among all age groups. How about free Wi-Fi hotspots so that people can stay connected even while enjoying the outdoors? And let’s not forget the potential for local cafes and artisans to set up shop, contributing to the park’s vibrancy and the city’s economy.
Yes, these upgrades will require investment, but the benefits far outweigh the costs. Studies have shown that green spaces significantly improve mental health and social cohesion. Besides, we have the opportunity to apply for government grants that could cover up to 50% of the renovation expenses.
Let us seize the moment to transform our community park into a hub of activity and engagement for the 21st century. Thank you.
Excerpt: Community Council Meeting Transcript Agenda Item 9: Community Park Renovations
Alex Torres, Local Resident May 3
Good evening, everyone. I have cherished our community park since I was a child. However, I hold a perspective that diverges from Mr. Lin’s regarding the park’s renovation.
Consider this: should we really pour money into modernizing a park when our community has more pressing concerns? I agree that the park has its charms and potential, but are tech upgrades truly what we need?
My answer is a resolute “no.”
Installing interactive fitness stations is a fine idea, but not everyone is inclined towards such activities. And Wi-Fi? The park should be a place to disconnect from technology, not become further entangled with it. As for encouraging businesses to enter the park space, this could detract from its natural beauty and peaceful atmosphere.
Mr. Lin mentions community health benefits, yet he overlooks that people have different preferences for relaxation and exercise. Not everyone thrives in an ‘upgraded’ environment. Some of us appreciate the park just as it is — simple and tranquil.
Instead of chasing after government grants for ambitious projects, why not allocate our resources to more fundamental services that our residents need, like improving public transportation or fixing the potholes that riddle our roads?
I respect Mr. Lin’s passion for innovation, but let’s not lose sight of our current necessities in pursuit of an idealistic future. Thank you.
What is the primary purpose of Jordan Lin’s proposal for community park renovations?
Agenda Item 9: Community Park Renovations
Jordan Lin, Community Member
Since the early 1900s, our community park has been a sanctuary for families, fitness enthusiasts, and nature lovers alike. It was a place where the laughter of children filled the air as they played on swings and slides, where people jogged or walked dogs along tree-lined paths, and where weekend picnics brought neighbors together. However, as the years went by, the attention shifted towards digital entertainment, and our beloved park began to see fewer visitors.
Today, I propose that we revitalize our park to adapt to the modern needs of our citizens. This is not just about preserving history; it’s about enhancing community health and connectivity. Let’s introduce interactive fitness equipment that encourages physical activity among all age groups. How about free Wi-Fi hotspots so that people can stay connected even while enjoying the outdoors? And let’s not forget the potential for local cafes and artisans to set up shop, contributing to the park’s vibrancy and the city’s economy.
Yes, these upgrades will require investment, but the benefits far outweigh the costs. Studies have shown that green spaces significantly improve mental health and social cohesion. Besides, we have the opportunity to apply for government grants that could cover up to 50% of the renovation expenses.
Let us seize the moment to transform our community park into a hub of activity and engagement for the 21st century. Thank you.
Excerpt: Community Council Meeting Transcript Agenda Item 9: Community Park Renovations
Alex Torres, Local Resident May 3
Good evening, everyone. I have cherished our community park since I was a child. However, I hold a perspective that diverges from Mr. Lin’s regarding the park’s renovation.
Consider this: should we really pour money into modernizing a park when our community has more pressing concerns? I agree that the park has its charms and potential, but are tech upgrades truly what we need?
My answer is a resolute “no.”
Installing interactive fitness stations is a fine idea, but not everyone is inclined towards such activities. And Wi-Fi? The park should be a place to disconnect from technology, not become further entangled with it. As for encouraging businesses to enter the park space, this could detract from its natural beauty and peaceful atmosphere.
Mr. Lin mentions community health benefits, yet he overlooks that people have different preferences for relaxation and exercise. Not everyone thrives in an ‘upgraded’ environment. Some of us appreciate the park just as it is — simple and tranquil.
Instead of chasing after government grants for ambitious projects, why not allocate our resources to more fundamental services that our residents need, like improving public transportation or fixing the potholes that riddle our roads?
I respect Mr. Lin’s passion for innovation, but let’s not lose sight of our current necessities in pursuit of an idealistic future. Thank you.
Based on Jordan Lin’s speech, what is the likely outcome of the park renovations?
Agenda Item 9: Community Park Renovations
Jordan Lin, Community Member
Since the early 1900s, our community park has been a sanctuary for families, fitness enthusiasts, and nature lovers alike. It was a place where the laughter of children filled the air as they played on swings and slides, where people jogged or walked dogs along tree-lined paths, and where weekend picnics brought neighbors together. However, as the years went by, the attention shifted towards digital entertainment, and our beloved park began to see fewer visitors.
Today, I propose that we revitalize our park to adapt to the modern needs of our citizens. This is not just about preserving history; it’s about enhancing community health and connectivity. Let’s introduce interactive fitness equipment that encourages physical activity among all age groups. How about free Wi-Fi hotspots so that people can stay connected even while enjoying the outdoors? And let’s not forget the potential for local cafes and artisans to set up shop, contributing to the park’s vibrancy and the city’s economy.
Yes, these upgrades will require investment, but the benefits far outweigh the costs. Studies have shown that green spaces significantly improve mental health and social cohesion. Besides, we have the opportunity to apply for government grants that could cover up to 50% of the renovation expenses.
Let us seize the moment to transform our community park into a hub of activity and engagement for the 21st century. Thank you.
Excerpt: Community Council Meeting Transcript Agenda Item 9: Community Park Renovations
Alex Torres, Local Resident May 3
Good evening, everyone. I have cherished our community park since I was a child. However, I hold a perspective that diverges from Mr. Lin’s regarding the park’s renovation.
Consider this: should we really pour money into modernizing a park when our community has more pressing concerns? I agree that the park has its charms and potential, but are tech upgrades truly what we need?
My answer is a resolute “no.”
Installing interactive fitness stations is a fine idea, but not everyone is inclined towards such activities. And Wi-Fi? The park should be a place to disconnect from technology, not become further entangled with it. As for encouraging businesses to enter the park space, this could detract from its natural beauty and peaceful atmosphere.
Mr. Lin mentions community health benefits, yet he overlooks that people have different preferences for relaxation and exercise. Not everyone thrives in an ‘upgraded’ environment. Some of us appreciate the park just as it is — simple and tranquil.
Instead of chasing after government grants for ambitious projects, why not allocate our resources to more fundamental services that our residents need, like improving public transportation or fixing the potholes that riddle our roads?
I respect Mr. Lin’s passion for innovation, but let’s not lose sight of our current necessities in pursuit of an idealistic future. Thank you.
How does Alex Torres’ comparison of past and present use of the park support his stance against extensive renovations?